The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's evaluation of conflicting expert testimony. The record supports the court's detailed factual findings, in which it rejected defendant's extreme emotional disturbance defense (see generally People v. Roche,
The court properly determined that there was no good cause for appointment of new counsel (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.