1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 115 P.3d
  5. 115 P.3d 124 (2005)
 

ROWLAND v. KELLOGG BROWN AND ROOT, INC.

No. 2 CA-CV 2004-0209.

115 P.3d 124 (2005)

James Dennis ROWLAND, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. KELLOGG BROWN AND ROOT, INC., and Kellogg Brown and Root Services, INC., Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

June 20, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McNamara, Goldsmith, Jackson & Macdonald, P.C., by Bruce G. Macdonald and Sue Ann Welch, Tucson, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Humphrey & Petersen, P.C., by Elizabeth L. Warner and Andrew J. Petersen, Tucson, for Defendants/Appellees.

OPINION

ESPINOSA, J.

¶ 1 Appellant James Rowland contends the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of appellee Kellogg, Brown and Root, Inc., and dismissing Rowland's personal injury action on the ground that the applicable limitations period had elapsed before he had filed a valid complaint. We agree and reverse.

Factual and Procedural Summary

¶ 2 In reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we view the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases