1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 110 P.3d
  5. 110 P.3d 128 (2005)
 

CHASE v. VERNAM

01-01-11862; A120876.

110 P.3d 128 (2005)

199 Or. App. 129

Franklin E. CHASE, Appellant, v. David D. VERNAM and Deborah L. Vernam, dba VEMCO, dba Vernam Equipment Manufacturing Company, Inc., dba Vernam, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Respondents, and Richard D. Vernam, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 13, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Gilbertson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Ransom, Gilbertson, Martin & Lefkowitz, LLP.

Mona K. Williams, Enterprise, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and DEITS, Judge pro tempore.

DEITS, J. pro tempore.

Plaintiff filed a complaint for unlawful discrimination against his employer,1 asserting that his employment had been terminated in retaliation for pursuing a workers' compensation claim. ORS 659A.109; ORS 659A.043; ORS 659A.885(1).2 Because the amount requested in plaintiff's complaint was less than $25,000, the action was subject to mandatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases