The narrow issue of whether two paragraphs from a letter by Ms. Beiny to her father should have been excluded from evidence as subject to the attorney-client privilege was not previously determined and was appropriately raised by petitioners before the referee. In any event, the prior evidentiary ruling that the letter as a whole was privileged from disclosure was not immune from reconsideration (see People v Evans,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF BEINY
16 A.D.3d 221 (2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 24
In the Matter of ROTRAUT L.U. BEINY, as Trustee of the Trust Created by ELISABETH N.F. WEINBERG, as Grantor. MARTIN WYNYARD et al., Respondents, v. ROTRAUT L.U. BEINY et al., Respondents, and MICHELE BEINY HARKINS et al., Appellants. THE ANTIQUE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., Intervening Petitioner.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 17, 2005.
March 17, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
