The court's response to a jury note does not warrant reversal. The deliberating jury's question, relating to specific testimony, appeared to call for a yes or no answer, but could not reasonably be answered in that manner. Instead, the court gave a fair and balanced response, essentially repeating instructions already delivered in its main charge, and the court did not express or imply any opinion as to the credibility of any witness or how the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. WILKINS
16 A.D.3d 217 (2005)
790 N.Y.S.2d 666
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TERRANCE WILKINS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 15, 2005.
March 15, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
