CATALINA YACHTS v. PIERCE

No. S-10720.

105 P.3d 125 (2005)

CATALINA YACHTS, Appellant, v. Jim and Karen PIERCE, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

January 14, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric A. Kueffner, Faulkner Banfield, P.C., Juneau, for Appellant.

No appearance by Appellees.

Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, and BRYNER, Justices.


OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Jim and Karen Pierce rejected an offer of judgment made by Catalina Yachts under Alaska Civil Rule 68 in a breach of warranty case. The superior court denied Catalina's later motion for attorney's fees and costs under Alaska Civil Rule 68, holding that the rule did not apply and was preempted by the Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act. Because we conclude that Alaska...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases