PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the trial court's summary denial of his postconviction motion attacking the legality of his sentence. The appellant claims his sentence is illegal because he was habitualized for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell, which is not authorized for violations of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1998), which relates to possession or purchase of a controlled substance. Brown v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.