PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction of dealing in stolen property. There was sufficient evidence that appellant pawned a DVD player which he knew, or should have known, was stolen. Appellant told a detective that "he knew that it was stolen and that he made a mistake." Appellant's story was that the DVD player was received by his friend as payment in a drug transaction, and that he knew he was taking a risk in pawning the item. Receiving property as payment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
