STEFANONI v. DUNCAN

No. 25844.

883 A.2d 1271 (2005)

92 Conn.App. 172

Christopher STEFANONI et al. v. Ian M. DUNCAN.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 1, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Margaret Stefanoni, pro se, and Christopher Stefanoni, pro se, the appellants (plaintiffs).

Donald Bruce Hill, for the appellee (defendant).

McLACHLAN, GRUENDEL and HARPER, Js.


GRUENDEL, J.

The plaintiffs, Christopher Stefanoni and Margaret Stefanoni, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, concerning the existence of a prescriptive utility easement over a portion of their property and the extent of both a view restriction on and an access easement over the property of the defendant, Ian M. Duncan. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly held that (1) the defendant possesses a prescriptive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases