1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 886 A.2d
  5. 886 A.2d 1217 (2005)
 

CITY OF NEW LONDON v. FOSS AND BOURKE, INC.

No. 17308.

886 A.2d 1217 (2005)

276 Conn. 522

CITY OF NEW LONDON v. FOSS AND BOURKE, INC.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 27, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. George Kanabis, with whom, on the brief, was Renee Marie Houle, New London, for the appellant (defendant).

David P. Condon, with whom was Edward B. O'Connell, New London, for the appellee (plaintiff).

SULLIVAN, C.J., and BORDEN, KATZ, PALMER and VERTEFEUILLE, Js.

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the assembled economic unit doctrine1 was not applicable to the trial court's determination of the value of the property taken pursuant to the eminent domain powers of the plaintiff, the city of New London. Specifically, the plaintiff, acting through the New London Development Corporation, commenced a condemnation action under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases