1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 16 A.D.3d
  5. 16 A.D.3d 194 (2005)
 

BENEVENTINE v. BENEVENTINE

16 A.D.3d 194 (2005)

790 N.Y.S.2d 387

GERMANIA M. BENEVENTINE, Respondent, v. JOSEPH M. BENEVENTINE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 10, 2005.

The motion court's denial of defendant's counsel fee application was a proper exercise of discretion, particularly in light of the disparity in the parties' respective financial positions and defendant's record of noncompliance in meeting his support obligations (see DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879, 881 [1987]). While defendant complains that he has not been properly credited for the support payments he has made, we note...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases