STOCKLY v. DOIL


870 A.2d 1208 (2005)

2005 ME 47

A. Holmes STOCKLY et al. v. Aynne M. DOIL et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided: April 5, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Juliet T. Browne, Esq. (orally), Scott W. Boak, Esq., Verrill Dana, LLP, Portland, for plaintiffs.

James B. Haddow, Esq. (orally), Petruccelli, Martin & Haddow, LLP, Portland, for defendant.

Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.


RUDMAN, J.

[¶ 1] Aynne M. Doil appeals and A. Holmes and Doris Stockly cross-appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Humphrey, C.J.) finding Doil liable pursuant to both 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 75521 and 7552-A2 (2003). Doil asserts that the court erred by finding her liable pursuant to both statutes and by awarding attorney fees to the Stocklys. The Stocklys argue that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases