1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 879 A.2d
  5. 879 A.2d 1185 (2005)
 

ZELMA v. KONIKOW

879 A.2d 1185 (2005)

379 N.J. Super. 480

Richard M. ZELMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joel KONIKOW and Konikow Associates, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 8, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kaps & Barto, and Blau & Blau, attorneys for appellant (Raymond Barto, Hackensack, and Jennifer Castranova, on the brief).

Uscher, Quiat, Uscher & Russo, attorneys for respondents (Michael E. Quiat and Patrick X. Amoresano, Hackensack, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, PARRILLO and GRALL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRALL, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Richard M. Zelma appeals from an order of the Special Civil Part of the Law Division dismissing his complaint under the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C.A. § 227, as untimely because it was not filed within the two-year limitation provided for pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:14-10. We conclude that such actions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases