PER CURIAM.
Appellant was re-sentenced after successfully moving to correct his initial sentence, which exceeded the statutory maximum. We reverse and remand the sentence imposed at re-sentencing, because appellant was not represented by counsel at re-sentencing and the record does not show his knowing waiver of the right to counsel. See State v. Scott,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.