CAMPBELL v. CITY OF NY


4 N.Y.3d 200 (2005)

825 N.E.2d 121

791 N.Y.S.2d 880

JOSEPH CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 17, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Kelligrew, White Plains, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Mordecai Newman and Larry A. Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondent.

Judges CIPARICK, ROSENBLATT, GRAFFEO, READ and R.S. SMITH concur with Chief Judge KAYE; Judge G.B. SMITH dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge KAYE.

The issue before us is whether the year-and-90-day period contained in General Municipal Law § 50-i is a statute of limitations (to which the tolling provision of CPLR 205 [a] applies) or a condition precedent to suit (which is a substantive limitation on the right to sue). We agree with plaintiff that section 50-i sets forth a statute of limitations, not a condition precedent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases