1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 19 A.D.3d
  5. 19 A.D.3d 182 (2005)
 

MORDAS v. SCHENKEIN

19 A.D.3d 182 (2005)

798 N.Y.S.2d 396

LYNN MORDAS, Appellant, v. MICHAEL SCHENKEIN, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 9, 2005.

Both the trial court and the postjudgment court properly recognized that, under whatever semantic variation advanced, plaintiff should not be permitted to change the venue of a protracted divorce action that she herself had commenced in New York County six years before she first sought the change, and after a lengthy trial on all issues (cf. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v Benjamin, 1 A.D.3d 39, 40 [2003]). We note that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases