PER CURIAM.
The appellant appeals the denial of his rule 3.850 motion following an evidentiary hearing. As his third and fourth grounds for relief, the appellant asserted ineffective assistance of counsel claims for trial counsel's failure to preserve certain issues for appellate review. The trial court denied the claims on the basis that the claims were not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion because they could have been raised on direct appeal. The appellant contends...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
