1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 866 A.2d
  5. 866 A.2d 1035 (2005)
 

SPRENGER v. TROUT

866 A.2d 1035 (2005)

375 N.J. Super. 120

Troy SPRENGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. TROUT, Sr. and Bridgeton Spring & Welding, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 14, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lummis, Krell & Baker, attorneys for appellant (Theodore E. Baker, Bridgeton, on the brief).

Christopher Tirrell, Bridgeton, attorney for respondents.

Before Judges NEWMAN, AXELRAD and HOLSTON, JR.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HOLSTON, JR., J.A.D.

Defendants, Robert E. Trout, Sr. (Trout) and Bridgeton Spring and Welding (BSW), appeal the August 9, 2002 judgment in favor of plaintiff, Troy Sprenger, entered upon a jury verdict. The jury verdict determined that defendants violated the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA or Act) by failing to comply with the regulations pertaining to automotive repairs in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases