1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 25 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 25 Cal.Rptr.3d 164 (2005)
 

BOELTS v. CITY OF LAKE FOREST

No. G033549.

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 164 (2005)

127 Cal.App.4th 116

Harvey BOELTS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF LAKE FOREST, et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Denied June 8, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Kathryn Reimann and Kathryn Reimann, Monterey; Best Best & Kreiger, Scott C. Smith, Irvine, and Gene Tanaka, Riverside, for Defendants and Appellants.

Richards, Watson & Gershon and T. Peter Pierce, Los Angeles, for League of California Cities and Other Agencies as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

Palmieri, Tyler, Wiener, Wilhelm & Waldron, Michael H. Leifer and Ronald M. Cole, Irvine, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

SILLS, P.J.

I. SUMMARY

California's Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Saf.Code, § 33000 et seq.1) requires a finding that a project area is blighted in order to establish a redevelopment plan. (§ 33367, subd. (d)(1); e.g., Sweetwater Valley Civic Assn. v. City of National City (1976) 18 Cal.3d 270, 277, 133 Cal.Rptr. 859

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases