1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 19 A.D.3d
  5. 19 A.D.3d 169 (2005)
 

HALL DICKLER KENT GOLDSTEIN & WOOD v. COLEMAN

19 A.D.3d 169 (2005)

798 N.Y.S.2d 375

HALL DICKLER KENT GOLDSTEIN & WOOD, as Successor to HALL DICKLER FRIEDMAN & WOOD, L.L.P., Respondent, v. ARTHUR COLEMAN, III, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 9, 2005.

The verdict was not irrational, and there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's reasoning and inferences (see Vasquez v Figueroa, 262 A.D.2d 179, 180 [1999]). Defendant failed to meet his burden of showing that the counterclaim alleging malpractice was anything but a posttrial stratagem to shift the blame for his failure to advise his attorneys of his surreptitious withdrawals from his 401 (k) accounts. We reject the notion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases