PER CURIAM.
The trial court erred in denying appellant's post-conviction motion as successive. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Appellant voluntarily dismissed his first post-conviction motion before the trial court ruled on the merits. Accordingly, the subsequently filed motion was not successive. Watson v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.