LOOMIS v. COM., BD. OF PROBATION AND PAROLE


878 A.2d 963 (2005)

Jeffrey Wayne LOOMIS, Petitioner v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided July 12, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Wayne Loomis, petitioner, pro se.

Chad L. Allensworth, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: PELLEGRINI, J., LEAVITT, J. and FLAHERTY, Senior Judge.


OPINION BY Judge PELLEGRINI.

Before this Court are preliminary objections filed by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) in response to a pro se Application and Motion for a Writ of Review by way of a Writ of Mandamus1 filed by Jeffrey Wayne Loomis (Loomis) in which he alleges that the Board violated the ex post facto clause2 by relying on the amended 1996 Parole Act requiring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases