1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 885 A.2d
  5. 885 A.2d 955 (2005)
 

KENNELLY-MURRAY v. MEGILL

885 A.2d 955 (2005)

381 N.J. Super. 303

Patricia KENNELLY-MURRAY and Richard Murray, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward C. MEGILL, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 17, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene Cross, Wall, argued the cause for appellants (Ramp & Renaud, attorneys; Ann L. Renaud, East Brunswick, of counsel and on the brief).

Kenneth A. Seltzer argued the cause for respondent (Law Offices of Stephen E. Gertler, Wall, attorneys; Mr. Seltzer, on the brief).

Before Judges ALLEY, C.S. FISHER and YANNOTTI.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, J.A.D.

In this verbal threshold matter, we hold, among other things, that by narrowing one of the bodily injury categories contained in the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act of 1988 (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 — that is, by replacing the pre-existing "fractures" category with a "displaced fractures" category — the Legislature did not intend to bar claims based upon only "non-displaced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases