ALLIANCE FOR DISABLED IN ACTION, INC. v. CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES AND EDISON TYLER VILLAGES


885 A.2d 952 (2005)

185 N.J. 331

ALLIANCE FOR DISABLED IN ACTION, INC., (ADA), a New Jersey Not-for-Profit Corporation, on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of the Class, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES AND EDISON TYLER VILLAGES, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellants, and Construction Official of the Township of Edison and Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects and Planners, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 1, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David M. Hutt, Woodbridge, argued the cause for appellants (Hutt & Shimanowitz, attorneys; Mr. Hutt, Stewart M. Hutt and Jonathan G. Burnham, on the briefs).

David J. Popiel, South Orange, argued the cause for respondent (Harold B. Garwin, President, Community Health Law Project, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Wefing's written opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 371 N.J.Super. 398, 853 A.2d 328 (2004).

For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERA-SOTO — 7.

Opposed

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases