1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 875 A.2d
  5. 875 A.2d 955 (2005)
 

MURPHY v. NEW ROAD CONST.

875 A.2d 955 (2005)

378 N.J. Super. 238

James J. MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW ROAD CONSTRUCTION, and Kanalstein, Danton and Johns, P.A., Defendants, and Cannon Group, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. McMullen Roofing, Third-Party Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 13, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Devine, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellant (White and Williams, attorneys; Daniel J. O'Brien and Mr. Devine, on the brief).

John M. Becker, Bellmawr, argued the cause for defendant/third-party plaintiff-respondent (Thompson Becker & Bothwell, attorneys; Kevin M. Bothwell, on the brief).

Before Judges KESTIN, ALLEY and FALCONE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KESTIN, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's order of March 8, 2002, dismissing his claim against defendant Cannon Group (Cannon) on the basis that an affidavit of merit was required by N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-26 to -29 and had not been provided. During the course of these proceedings, before and since the notice of appeal was filed, plaintiff's claims against the two other defendants, New Road Construction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases