COPE, J.
Michael Anthony Smith appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. He contends that he does not qualify as a habitual felony offender ("HFO"). We disagree and affirm.
Defendant-appellant Smith maintains that he does not qualify as an HFO because the two predicate offenses for habitualization were ones in which he was adjudicated guilty but placed on probation. He argues that under Richardson v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
