1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 116 P.3d
  5. 116 P.3d 64 (2005)
 

LEE v. BALL

No. 41686.

116 P.3d 64 (2005)

Barry J. LEE, Appellant, v. Christopher G. BALL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

July 28, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald M. Pehr, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Piazza & Associates and Carl F. Piazza and David H. Putney, Las Vegas, for Respondent.

Before MAUPIN, DOUGLAS and PARRAGUIRRE, JJ.

OPINION

MAUPIN, J.

In this appeal, we clarify that a district court's grant of additur is only appropriate when presented to the defendant as an alternative to a new trial on damages.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The litigation below arose from a car accident in which the passenger in a vehicle, respondent Christopher Ball, sustained injuries after the driver, appellant Barry Lee, negligently turned into oncoming traffic....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases