1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 403 F.3d
  5. 403 F.3d 1364 (2005)
 

NAZOMI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. ARM HOLDINGS, PLC

No. 04-1101.

403 F.3d 1364 (2005)

NAZOMI COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARM HOLDINGS, PLC, Arm Limited, and Arm, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 11, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Friel, Jr., Cooley Godward LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Brandon D. Baum, Lori R.E. Ploeger, and Bernard C. Shek.

Robert P. Taylor, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Andrew Y. Piatnicia and Ethan B. Andelman.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted partial summary judgment in favor of ARM Holdings, PLC, ARM Limited, and ARM, Inc. (collectively ARM), finding that ARM's accused product did not infringe Nazomi Communications, Inc.'s (Nazomi's) U.S. Patent No. 6,332,215 (the '215 patent). Nazomi Communications, Inc. v. Arm Holdings, PLC, No. C 02-02521 (N.D.Cal. Sept. 30, 2003). Because the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases