PEOPLE v. KATO


24 A.D.3d 152 (2005)

808 N.Y.S.2d 154

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERVIN KATO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 6, 2005.


The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to provide defendant with an advance ruling delineating precisely what testimony would open the door to the admission of otherwise precluded uncharged crime evidence as a Molineux exception (see People v. Frazier, 309 A.D.2d 534 [2003], lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 571 [2003], see also People v. Ardito, 231 A.D.2d 116 [1997...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases