Defendant's claim that his prior criminal act, which formed the basis of his previous youthful offender adjudication, could not be used as an overt act on the instant conspiracy charge, essentially attacks the legal sufficiency of the indictment, i.e., that the conspiracy charge is supported by an improper overt act. Such claim was waived by defendant's plea of guilty and waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Allen,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
