WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN v. GARFIELD BD.


876 A.2d 877 (2005)

379 N.J. Super. 51

WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The GARFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Respondent/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. State of New Jersey Department of Education and New Jersey Economic Development Agency, Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 15, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Kenny, River Edge, argued the cause for appellant (Peckar & Abramson, attorneys; Mr. Kenny and Craig H. Parker, on the brief).

Howard M. Nirenberg, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent Garfield Board of Education (Nirenberg & Varano, attorneys; Mr. Nirenberg and Sandra N. Varano, on the brief).

Respondents State of New Jersey Department of Education and New Jersey Economic Development Agency submitted a statement in lieu of brief.

Before Judges WEFING, PAYNE and C.S. FISHER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEFING, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Williams Scotsman, Inc. appeals from a trial court order granting summary judgment to defendant Garfield Board of Education. After reviewing the record in light of the contentions advanced on appeal, we reverse.

This litigation is an outgrowth of the continuing efforts of the Supreme Court to assure equal educational opportunities for the children of this state, no matter in which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases