1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 429 F.3d
  5. 429 F.3d 1324 (2005)
 

TINKER v. BEASLEY

No. 04-14597.

429 F.3d 1324 (2005)

Chiketta TINKER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Perry BEASLEY, Dan Watson, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

November 10, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin Christopher Newsom, Montgomery, AL, Jack M. Curtis, Alabama Dept. of Public Safety, Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellants.

George P. Ford, Howard Edgar Howard, Ford, Howard & Cornett, P.C., Gadsden, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BIRCH, HULL and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Defendants-appellants, Perry Beasley and Dan Watson, appeal the district court's denial of their motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity and discretionary-function immunity. The appeal requires us to address: (1) whether the coercive questioning of plaintiff-appellee, Chiketta Tinker, by Beasley and Watson, constitutes a violation of Tinker's substantive due process rights even though it did not result in a confession or other self-incrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases