MODEN v. U.S.

No. 04-5092.

404 F.3d 1335 (2005)

Donald MODEN and Barbara Moden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 15, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ted L. McBride, Beardsley, Jensen & Von Wald, Prof. L.L.C., of Rapid City, South Dakota, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Katherine J. Barton, Attorney, Appellate Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Thomas L. Sansonetti, Assistant Attorney General, Mark Haag, Attorney, and, William Shapiro, Attorney, General Litigation Section.

Nancie G. Marzulla, Defenders Of Property Rights, of Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Defenders Of Property Rights.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges.


PROST, Circuit Judge.

Donald and Barbara Moden appeal the dismissal of their case by the United States Court of Federal Claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Moden v. United States, 60 Fed. Cl. 275 (2004). For the reasons stated herein, we treat the dismissal as a grant of summary judgment. Because the Modens fail to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to at least one element of their claim, we affirm the grant of summary judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases