PASQUINCE v. BRIGHTON ARMS APTS.


876 A.2d 834 (2005)

378 N.J. Super. 588

John PASQUINCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRIGHTON ARMS APARTMENTS, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 30, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott R. Conover, Toms River, argued the cause for appellant (Ocean-Monmouth Legal Services, attorney; Mr. Conover, of counsel and on the brief).

Christopher J. Hanlon, Freehold, argued the cause for respondent (Hanlon & Niemann, attorneys; Mr. Hanlon and Andrea I. Bazer, of counsel and on the brief).

Feinstein, Raiss, Kelin & Booker, West Orange, attorneys for amicus curiae New Jersey Apartment Association (Gary D. Gordon and Tracey Goldstein, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, LINTNER and YANNOTTI.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff John Pasquince appeals from a decision in the Special Civil Part, following a bench trial, concluding that he had been properly rejected as a proposed tenant by Brighton Arms Apartments due to his lack of creditworthiness, rather than because he was a recipient of Section 81 housing assistance. Plaintiff's summary proceeding application under R. 4:67...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases