1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 34 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 34 Cal.Rptr.3d 136 (2005)
 

MIRPAD v. CALIFORNIA INS. GUARANTEE ASSN.

No. B176080.

34 Cal.Rptr.3d 136 (2005)

132 Cal.App.4th 1058

MIRPAD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

September 19, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pircher, Nichols & Meeks and James Goldman, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Black, Compean & Hall, Frederick G. Hall, Los Angeles, and Jacqueline L. Shulman for Defendant and Appellant.

CROSKEY, J.

In this appeal, we apply the rule that the plain meaning of insurance policy language may be established by considering such language in the context of the entire policy, even though, in other contexts, it might have a different meaning. The question presented by this case is the proper interpretation to be given to the "wrongful eviction" portion of the "personal injury" coverage provisions contained in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases