1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 372 F.Supp.2d
  5. 372 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2005)
 

U.S. v. FLOWERS

Civil Action No. 2:68cv2709-T.

372 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2005)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Timothy D. Pope, Plaintiff-Intervenor, Johnny Reynolds, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, Eugene Crum, Jr., et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, v. Tommy G. FLOWERS, et al., Defendants. Alabama State Conference of NAACP Branches, Amicus Curiae.

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division.

May 20, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay D. Adelstein, Washington, DC, Marybeth Martin, Washington, DC, Patricia A. Snyder, Montgomery, AL, Sharon A. Seeley, Stephen J. Curran, Washington, DC, for United States of America.

Gary Lamar Brown, Jimmy Michael Cooper, Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Jr., Richard Scott Clark, Fitzpatrick, Cooper & Clark, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Timothy D. Pope.

Ann K. Wiggins, Deborah Ann Mattison, Henry Wallace Blizzard, III, Kell Ascher Simon, Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., Rocco Calamusa, Jr., Russell Wayne Adams, Robert F. Childs, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Johnny Reynolds.

Kell Ascher Simon, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Peggy Allen, Martha Ann Boleware, Jeffrey Brown, Ouida Maxwell, Cecil Parker, Robert Johnson.

Christopher W. Weller, Henry Clay Barnett, Jr., Capell Howard PC, Montgomery, AL, John J. Park, Jr., Montgomery, AL, Lisa Wright Borden, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC, Birmingham, AL, Mai Lan Fogal Isler, Capell Howard PC, Margaret L. Fleming, Montgomery, AL, Patrick Hanlon Sims, Cabaniss Johnston Gardner Dumas & O'Neal, Mobile, AL, R. Frank Ussery, Richard N. Meadows, Montgomery, AL, for Thomas G. Flowers.

Mark Jefferson Williams, Montgomery, AL, for Ala State Employees, Bob Cook, Al Sessions, Ann Geisenheimer.

Alice Ann Byrne, Christopher W. Weller, Capell Howard PC, Henry Clay Barnett, Jr., Capell Howard PC, John J. Park, Jr., Montgomery, AL, Lisa Wright Borden, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC, Birmingham, AL, Mai Lan Fogal Isler, Capell Howard PC, Margaret L. Fleming, R. Frank Ussery, Richard N. Meadows, Montgomery, AL, for State of Alabama Personnel Department.

Alabama Department of Corrections, Legal Division, Montgomery, AL, pro se.

J. Richard Cohen, Montgomery, AL, for Alabama State Conference of NAACP Branches.

Gary Lamar Brown, Fitzpatrick, Cooper & Clark, Birmingham, AL, for Billy R. Stephens, Janet E. Justice, John D'Arville, Quinton W. Beard, Loyd Arrington.

Edward Andrew Hosp, Maynard Cooper & Gale, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Don Siegelman.

Robert F. Childs, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Rocco Calamusa, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Private Plaintiffs.

Deborah Ann Mattison, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Henry Wallace Blizzard, III, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, P.C., Kell Ascher Simon, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Russell Wayne Adams, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Ouida Maxwell, Peggy Vonsherie Allen.

Ann K. Wiggins, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Byron Reynard Perkins, Perkins & Associates, Henry Wallace Blizzard, III, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, P.C., Robert F. Childs, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Rocco Calamusa, Jr., Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Russell Wayne Adams, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Kell Ascher Simon, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantanzis, PC, Birmingham, AL, for Eugene Crum, Jr. and other plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenors in In Re Employment Discrimination Litigation Against The State of Alabama Civil Action No. 94-T-356-N.

ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

This litigation, United States v. Flowers, civil action no. 2:68cv2709-T (previously styled United States v. Frazer, and still frequently known today as "Frazer" or the "Frazer litigation"), is before the court on the difficult issue of what discovery, if any, the court should allow before it decides whether Frazer's 35-year-old "no-bypass rule" should be terminated.

I....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases