Plaintiff obtained a Yellowstone injunction after receiving a letter from defendant claiming, insofar as pertinent, that plaintiff's expansion of the subject structure was an "illegal construction" not in compliance with the Building Code, and demanding its removal within 10 days. Shortly thereafter, the Department of Buildings (DOB) issued a peremptory vacate order that, insofar as pertinent, stated that the structure was
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PIER 59 STUDIOS v. PIERS
19 A.D.3d 148 (2005)
796 N.Y.S.2d 92
PIER 59 STUDIOS, L.P., Appellant, v. CHELSEA PIERS, L.P., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 7, 2005.
June 7, 2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
