IN THE MATTER OF GUARDIANSHIP OF MACAK


871 A.2d 767 (2005)

377 N.J. Super. 167

In the Matter of the GUARDIANSHIP of Walter J. MACAK.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 27, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee B. Roth, Flemington, argued the cause for appellant Walter J. Macak (Lee B. Roth and Associates, attorneys; Erica Edwards, on the brief).

John W. Thatcher, South Plainfield, argued the cause for respondent LaDonna L. Burton (Thatcher & Lanza, attorneys; Mr. Thatcher, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, S.L. REISNER and GRAVES.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

Walter J. Macak appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment. The trial court dismissed a 2003 application in which Mr. Macak asked the court to set aside a 2002 judgment declaring him incapacitated and to restore him to legal capacity, pursuant to R. 4:86-7. We reverse and remand for a plenary hearing.

I

In 2002, Mr. Macak's daughter filed a complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases