METUCHEN SAV. BANK v. PIERINI


871 A.2d 759 (2005)

377 N.J. Super. 154

METUCHEN SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Geoffrey PIERINI and Smart Space, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 27, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Woller, Summit, argued the cause for appellants (Pfaltz & Woller, attorneys; Mr. Woller, on the brief).

Samuel C. Inglese, Metuchen, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges STERN, COBURN and S.L. REISNER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

STERN, P.J.A.D.

Defendant Geoffrey Pierini appeals from a $40,000 judgment1 entered in favor of plaintiff after a bench trial based on the deposit by Smart Space, Inc. of a $40,000 check jointly payable to Smart Space and Ace Audio-Visual which Ace did not endorse. Pierini is Smart Space's president and sole shareholder.2 He argues that the trial court improperly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases