1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 697 N.W.2d
  5. 697 N.W.2d 913 (2005)
 

LINSELL v. APPLIED HANDLING, INC.

Docket No. 249647.

697 N.W.2d 913 (2005)

266 Mich. App. 1

Mary Anne LINSELL, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. APPLIED HANDLING, INC., Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided February 8, 2005.

Approved for Publication April 19, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.

Released for Publication June 7, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timmis & Inman PLLC (by John C. Louisell and Michael F. Wais), Detroit, for the plaintiff.

Kienbaum Opperwall Hardy & Pelton, P.L.C. (by Elizabeth Hardy and William B. Forrest III), and Day & Butler, P.L.L.C. (by Mark T. Butler), Birmingham, Detroit, for the defendant.

Before: MARKEY, P.J., and FITZGERALD and OWENS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Applied Handling, Inc. (Applied), a Michigan corporation that sells material handling equipment to the automotive industry, appeals as of right a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Mary Anne Linsell, a former sales representative for Applied, in this breach of contract action. The jury awarded plaintiff damages in the amount of $498,500, as well as $576,000 pursuant to the penalty provision of the Michigan sales representative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases