BERMAN v. WAVERLY ASSOCIATES ET AL.


19 A.D.3d 136 (2005)

795 N.Y.S.2d 449

MITCHELL BERMAN, Respondent, v. WAVERLY ASSOCIATES et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 2, 2005.


Plaintiff improperly resorted to the procedure under CPLR 3213 to "enforce" an order of DHCR, and thus, an award of attorneys' fees was inappropriate. The administrative order at issue was not an instrument for the payment of money only. A clearly delineated procedure existed (in DHCR Fact Sheet No. 16, Collecting Overcharges in Rent Stabilized Apartments in New York City) for entering a "final" order for rent overcharges as a judgment at the conclusion of judicial proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases