1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 703 N.W.2d
  5. 703 N.W.2d 845 (2005)
 

ZANDER v. STATE

No. A04-2393.

703 N.W.2d 845 (2005)

Dan ZANDER, et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

September 20, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul R. Haik, Krebsbach & Haik, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for appellants.

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Lisa A. Crum, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by DIETZEN, Presiding Judge; STONEBURNER, Judge; and HUDSON, Judge.

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellants filed claims in district court under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA), Minn.Stat. §§ 116B.01-116B.13 (2004), alleging violations resulting from a state highway expansion project. The district court dismissed appellants' claims by granting respondent's motion for summary judgment. Because appellant has not presented genuine issues of material fact sufficient to support a prima facie case under MERA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases