Walter A. GLOD, Jr., M.D.
v.
W. Gregory BAKER, et al.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 23, 2005.
Rehearing Denied May 11, 2005.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Nancy Scott Degan, Roy C. Cheatwood, Jennifer B. McNamara, Kent Andrew Lambert, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, New Orleans, LA, Reginald J. Ringuet, Ringuet, Daniels & Collier, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellants — Nawlins Kajun Foods, L.L.C., NKF I-DR Limited Partnership, LAF Foods, Inc., BCM, L.L.C., Greg Baker Enterprises. CPCI Incorporated, Louis B. Viviano, CBC International, Inc., & V L B, Inc.
Steven Gerald Durio, Robert L. Broussard, Jessica Watts Farmer, Durio, McGoffin & Stagg, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees — Donald J. Baker, Kirby Pecot, Andrew B. Jameson, Max Luttgeharm, & M.L. Godley, M.D.
Joseph C. Giglio, Jr., Liskow & Lewis, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant — Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D.
Robert A. Kutcher, Nicole S. Tygier, Patricia Diane Tunmer, Keegan E. Chopin, Chopin, Wagar, Richard, & Kutcher, LLP, Metairie, LA, John Bologna Krentel, New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellees — Copeland's of New Orleans, Inc., the Succession of William A. Copeland, III, and Alvin C. Copeland, Jr.
William H. Parker, III, Allen & Gooch, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees — Darnall, Sikes, Kolder, Frederick & Rainey and Ed Larry Sikes.
Larry Lane Roy, Jennifer A. Wells, Preis, Kraft & Roy, Lafayette, LA, for Defendants/Appellees — Coregis Insurance Company and Chris Verret.
George Allen Walsh, Alice Estill, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendants/Appellees — W. Gregory Baker and Vikki Lynn Baiers.
Court composed of ULYSSES GENE THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, JIMMIE C. PETERS, and MARC T. AMY, Judges.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs, BCM, L.L.C. and Nawlins Kajun Foods, L.L.C., appeal the trial court's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Copeland's of New Orleans, Inc. The trial court determined that plaintiffs' claim under the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act had prescribed and that they did not sufficiently prove the elements of their intentional interference with contract claim. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I.
...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
