1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 27 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 27 Cal.Rptr.3d 126 (2005)
 

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. ATTISHA

No. D043044.

27 Cal.Rptr.3d 126 (2005)

128 Cal.App.4th 357

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF the CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Bahira ATTISHA et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division 1.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 6, 2005.

Review Denied July 27, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Niddrie & Fish, LLP and David A. Niddrie, San Diego, for Defendants and Appellants.

Casey Gwinn, City Attorney, Anita M. Noone, Assistant City Attorney, Leslie A. Fitzgerald, Deputy City Attorney; Law Offices of Don Detisch, Donald W. Detisch, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

McCONNELL, P.J.

In this eminent domain case, defendants Bahira and Behnam Attisha and Kheder and Balsam Attisha appeal a judgment awarding them $400,000 for loss of business goodwill. The Attishas contend the trial court erred by (1) disallowing compensation for business inventory; (2) striking the testimony of their expert goodwill valuation witness on the grounds that (a) under this court's opinion in San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Bd. v. Handlery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases