PER CURIAM.
The former husband, Jon Graham seeks reversal of the trial court's order on a motion to clarify the marital settlement agreement. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Because the marital settlement agreement contains ambiguous language with respect to the parties' intent concerning "reimbursement" for taxes paid, the matter must be remanded for an evidentiary hearing. See Levitt v. Levitt,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.