1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 691 N.W.2d
  5. 691 N.W.2d 824 (2005)
 

HYATT v. ANOKA POLICE DEPT.

No. A03-1707.

691 N.W.2d 824 (2005)

Lena M. HYATT, Appellant, v. ANOKA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 10, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall J. Fuller, William J. Marshall, Babcock, Neilson, Mannella, Klint, Anoka, MN, for Appellant's.

Jon K. Iverson, Paul D. Reuvers, Iverson Reuvers, LLC, Bloomington, MN, for Respondent's.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellant Lena Hyatt sued the City of Anoka and its police department (collectively, the "City") after she was injured by a police dog during the attempted arrest of her husband. Hyatt's complaint alleged liability solely on the basis of Minn.Stat. § 347.22 (2004) (the dog bite statute), which holds a dog owner strictly liable for injuries caused by the dog so long as the dog was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases