STATE v. WEMYSS

No. A04-1001.

696 N.W.2d 802 (2005)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Richard Robert WEMYSS, a/k/a Richard Robert Weyness, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 24, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Susan Gaertner, Ramsey County Attorney, Mark N. Lystig, Assistant County Attorney, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN; and Timothy T. Mulrooney, Rochelle Hauser (certified student attorney), Henson & Efron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

Considered and decided by DIETZEN, Presiding Judge; TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; and SHUMAKER, Judge.


OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction for failure to register as a predatory offender, arguing that the district court erred by admitting irrelevant and prejudicial evidence and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the charge. We conclude that the district court abused its discretion in admitting some of the challenged evidence, but the error was harmless, and the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases