STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. QUANTUM CORP.

No. CIV.A. 03M672.

370 F.Supp.2d 1116 (2005)

STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. QUANTUM CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

May 17, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy J. Gegenheimer, Holme, Roberts & Owen, LLP, Denver, CO, Thomas A. Lewry, Brooks Kushman, P.C., Southfield, MI, Timothy Robert Schulte, Storage Technology Corporation Office of Corporate Counsel, Louisville, CO, for Plaintiff.

Ann Elizabeth Citrin, J. Eric Elliff, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Stewart McNab, Carver, Kirchhoff, Schwarz, McNab & Bailey, LLC, Denver, CO, Christopher L. Kelley, Matthew E. Hocker, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, Menlo Park, CA, Floyd R. Nation, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, Houston, TX, for Defendant.


FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

MATSCH, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Storage Technology Corporation ("StorageTek") is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,549,363, issued April 15, 2003 ("the '363 patent"). By its motion for preliminary injunction, StorageTek seeks to enjoin defendant Quantum Corporation ("Quantum") from selling magnetic tape cartridges identified as SDLT I and II on the ground that the magnetic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases