NEASON v. CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

No. CV-S-02-1110-PMP(PAL).

352 F.Supp.2d 1133 (2005)

Arlis NEASON and Richard Neason, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK COUNTY, Nevada, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada; Sharon Coogan, Individually and as Investigator for Clark County Child Protective Services; Candice Bennett, Individually and as Supervisor for the Clark County Child Protective Services; Robert Teuton, Individually and as former Assistant Director of Clark County Child Protective Services; Robert Ranney, Individually and as Former Director of Clark County Child Protective Services; Carol Stillian, Individually and as Division Manager of Clark County Child Protective Services; Andrienne Cox, Individually and as Assistant Director of Clark County Child Protective Services; Cranford Crawford, Individually and as Assistant Director of Clark County Child Protective Services; Kirby Burgess, Individually and as Director of Clark County Child Protective Services; Marjorie Walker, Individually and as Social Welfare Program Specialist of State of Nevada Child & Family Services; Stephen Shaw, Individually and as former Administrator of State of Nevada Child & Family Services; Charlotte Crawford, Individually and as former Director of State of Nevada Child & Family Services; Edward Cotton, Individually and as Administrator of State of Nevada Child & Family Services; Michael Willden, Individually and as Director of State of Nevada Child & Family Services; City of Henderson (Henderson Police Department), a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada; Nick Roble, Individually and as Detective for Henderson Police Department; Jackie Miller, Individually and as Detective for Henderson Police Department; Does 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

January 4, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamilton D. Moore, Boulder City, NV, for Plaintiffs.

Eva Garcia-Mendoza, Luther Snavely, Garcia-Mendoza & Snavely, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendants.


ORDER

PRO, Chief Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Clark County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 54), filed on April 26, 2004. Plaintiffs Arlis and Richard Neason filed Plaintiff's Opposition to Clark County Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 63) on July 12, 2004. Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. # 65) on August 11, 2004.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Arlis and Richard Neason are the parents of Jeffrey...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases