CARTY v. ASHCROFT

No. 03-71392.

395 F.3d 1081 (2005)

Theophile CARTY, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed January 19, 2005.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew G. Ball (briefed and argued), Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner.

Edward C. Durant (argued) and David E. Dauenheimer (briefed), Office of Immigration Litigation, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Before: CANBY, JR., RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.

We must decide whether "intent to evade" is synonymous with "intent to defraud" within the meaning of the removal provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). Because we conclude the terms are synonymous, we dismiss the petition for review of Dr. Theophile Carty ("Carty"). Carty, a native of Anguilla, petitioned this court for relief from a Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming an Immigration Judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases